

Really high quality discussion man. Your views are well informed and updated to align with reality and totally not unhinged.
Really high quality discussion man. Your views are well informed and updated to align with reality and totally not unhinged.
they can’t
They can
Would you care to explain?
Unsurprising
someone asks you to explain your unpopular position so that they can better understand it
blocked
Ah yes, the paragon of reasonableness over here. I’ll return the favor.
“Plankton cheated!”
Timezone-wise though?
No? We’re perfectly fine!
Note how you can’t easily see the US because we don’t try to bend time to our will
This is why we need the map! I’m curious which prediction would be accurate.
It would be neat to have an interactive version where you can select different factors to control for, including pop. density, wealth level, children per family, etc.
Right, but that’s exactly my point, it likely wouldn’t just be one flat color. If you scale it by population density you get a map displaying the average distance between kids and parents compared to the average distance between any two people which I would expect to be 1. non-uniform and 2. more meaningful than raw kid-parent distance. The current map is useful and accurate, but I think the more interesting contributing factors are being drowned out by raw population density. Deciding what factors to control for (ie. pop. density, wealth level, etc.) results in a different meaningful outcome and is very important to consider when making conclusions based on the map. The image’s scale is probably too granular to do this analysis but if the raw data is finer-grained I would love to see a density-controlled version.
It would be interesting to scale this by population density
Say fellas, did somebody mention the door to darkness?
“Kairi… Kairi’s inside me?”
The whole Ansem thing also came out of absolutely nowhere
“How hot is it going to be today?”
“Get in the chest freezer, they invented a new color for us.”
He’s dead. Calling it now.