A random sub-reddit doesn’t represent any significant portion of “men,” as a class.

This is good thing for the dozen or so people benefiting from our unlimited funding to defense contractors and of course a bad thing for literally everyone else.

You don’t have to land on one thing and make it your personality for the rest of your life. It’s okay to grow as a person especially if you’re an adult.

Agreed, so why are you still worrying about Harry Potter (somehow) harming people? It’s time to move on from that 90’s rhetoric.

This is a great thing. Not even joking. No more coal and Energy exports? Perfect. Agriculture has to be sold locally and thus subject to the Agriculture Bill pricing ceiling and supply mandates? Great. (obviously the ag bill has a lot of room for improvement, but I digress.)

Perhaps, or perhaps they told Trump to fuck off. Or perhaps they don’t agree with Zelensky’s approach to ending the war and are trying to replace him, etc etc. I think it’s disingenuous and dangerous to assume that if someone doesn’t 100% agree with the current president of Ukraine that they are traitors.

Wow excellent analysis, anything against US Interests is Russian. And you base this upon what exactly?

Petro Poroshenko the former President of Ukraine, and Yulia Tymoshenko a former Prime Minister of Ukraine are Russian now?

Private prisons are paid per-head.

Propaganda is really only effective if you don’t recognize its bias to begin with. That’s why media literacy is so important.

Removed by mod

Hell yea. 100% taxes for all import and export of fossil fuels same with SUVs.

Sounds like the proper answer is to legalize the drugs, nationalize the cartel’s, and call the US drug policy out for the farce it is.

The idea to share this information is to empower someone

This also doesn’t seem desirable. Societal health isn’t achieved by a group of individual decisions. It is created by regulations on how much pesticide should be in consumer goods or how much risk various consumables should pose to an individual.

Caveat emptor isn’t a desirable public policy.

This isn’t the appropriate way to analyze health policy. If alcohol is bad for you, but we as a society have decided that it is ok for people to poison themselves, then when some unscrupulous capitalists makes it even worse for you, you don’t say “who cares it’s already bad for you, lol.” and then moralize about how if everyone doesn’t consume the exact same substances you do, they somehow deserve it.

It is ok for a certain level of toxicity to be permitted, but additional or different unwanted types of toxicity to be a public health concern.