That’s because Scotland isn’t making it part of their identity like USA did dude….

Also, the USA has their own bullshit version, single malt whiskey. Of course they would try and copy while refusing to let others -.-

…

If you make an aged oak spirit in the UK, it would be a corn whiskey, that exact same spirit in the USA would be Bourbon.

Thank you for the being the stereotypical ignorant American who thinks bourbon is unique.

A concurrent resolution adopted by the United States Congress in 1964 declared bourbon to be a “distinctive product of the United States” and asked “the appropriate agencies of the United States Government … [to] take appropriate action to prohibit importation into the United States of whiskey designated as ‘Bourbon Whiskey’.”[26][27] A U.S. federal regulation now restricts the definition of bourbon for whiskey to only include spirits produced in the U.S.[28]

That’s it, it’s literally a USA ego thing.

Also, scotch is a terrible example, that’s another unique one, it’s made in Scotland only…. You really don’t know your whiskey history at all do you?

Hey you just described the requirement of corn whiskey? Anyone can distill a spirit that could be called Bourbon, but they can’t, since it wasn’t bottled in the USA.

The only difference between a corn whiskey is bourbon is bottled in the USA, but try to make it sound better than it is. It’s a corn whiskey, bottled in the USA.

Try a corn whiskey, some people don’t like Rye or the other grains, but the only distinction (again) between corn whiskey and bourbon is quite literally Bourbon is only bottled in the USA. That’s it. Nothing else.

The “baiting” is to find the Americans, they cling to bourbon is better, but it’s really not, it’s a corn whiskey, distilled in the USA. Americans are the only ones swooning over a marketing difference.

You can take aged Kentucky bourbon over to the UK, but you couldn’t bottle is as bourbon, that’s how stupid this distinction is.

Found the American.

It’s all Whiskey, it having to be made in the USA is the only distinction of it being Bourbon.

There’s plenty of Whiskeys, Ryes and Corn Whiskeys that blow Bourbon out of the water.

Businesses have been sued out of business before. Not QUITE what you mean, but the ends still the same.

If a corporation used self driving cars that’s exactly how an accident would be dealt with….

?? It’s the same in Canada, and the EU as far as I am aware. It’s a pretty normal thing?

Kinda makes sense no? Corporations are people and are treated as such in courts.

What did they do to have negative events in Canada?

If you’re moving it, nothing you do will prevent port damage, that’s quite literally the one thing you shouldn’t do to preserve the ports life span….

If you can’t put the thing down to charge it, invest in a stand a controller instead of paying for it later on, or suck it up and let it charge for a bit instead of damaging your shit because you’re impatient or don’t want to get the right stuff…

Okay, if it’s laying down what difference does it make? The use case is a stand where gravity could affect the cable.

What other use case is there other than a stand? If you’re playing with it plugged in, it doesn’t matter what you’re doing, you’re going to be damaging the port.

The one thing people hated about the switch is downward socket, now we are intentionally adding it our decks…?

Where it’s going to be bent by the table or whatever it’s resting on anyways?