

should have been at ‘massive’ sanctions a couple years ago.
should have been at ‘massive’ sanctions a couple years ago.
donvict stopped shipments himself over two months ago, shortly after that meeting at the white house. src
there ain’t room. gotta get vd off it first.
BLOTUS
in a country that’s among the top in the world for ev adoption, too.
has zuck always been this fucking stupid, or has he just been eating his own dog food too long?
deportation sounds like the logical answer, but it’s probably preceded by getting tossed in jail and forgotten about.
translation: “don’t shoot! we need to resupply”
those were pre-purchased or bribed somehow? i could see 'em getting exemption to the u.s… cuz ‘reasons’.
“No free speech, no deal. It is as simple as that,”
did i warp into the onion without realizing?
“american dictator wannabe, go fuck yourself”
because when the u.s. destroys its global reputation, the dollar’s stability, relations with every ally, and itself from within----the prc wins. big.
it’s easier to run the bots from the inside, ain’t it, muskrat?
it’s a sign that the protests and plummeting sales are starting to hit the wallet and sting his overinflated ego.
if the eu responded to the diaper’s bullshit and put tariffs on his cars making them more expensive at retail… tesla would be finished in europe.
still winning! ain’t it grand?
i guess bytedance won’t be putting up that minority stake in trumptok, then.
penguins like cheetos. i remember that uh… ‘documentary’. we should send 'em a big giant fat one. no charge. just to say ‘sorry’ for imposing the unfair tariffs on their trade.
ok, then…
i have a huge trade deficit with walmart.
i buy way more from them than they do from me ($1200-1500 a year vs $0); just like the u.s. buys more from many countries than those countries buy from the u.s.
like the leaky diaper’s new tariffsimport tax, i should charge myself a ridiculously high extra tax on purchases from walmart until they buy $1200-1500 a year of some mythical product from me to even out the ‘unfair’ imbalance?
yea. that’ll work.
the exporter need not be based in the origin (‘tariffed’) country to have their goods taxed on import.
funneling profits to overseas subsidiaries to lower a corporation’s overall tax burden is a different issue.
this suit pertains to google’s renaming of the entire body of water instead of just the bits over the u.s. continental shelf; or essentially the u.s. eez–which is no more than 200nm from land, less where it runs into another nation’s eez.
that region extends roughly due east from the southern tip of texas to 200nm from flordia’s gulf coast, then south until it runs into cuba’s eez where it’s then split between the two countries.