

Somebody correct me but wasn’t it the US that quit the negotiations and now helped bombing Iran? Shouldn’t they be the ones called out?


Somebody correct me but wasn’t it the US that quit the negotiations and now helped bombing Iran? Shouldn’t they be the ones called out?


This. Claiming Iran has or has worked on WMD is the same fake casus belli as was given with Iraq.


I understand your reasoning but tariffs all around are just not the right tool as they affect your own market first and while the eu is the second biggest consumer market after the us, it just hasn’t the same margins to cut into for tariffs to properly bite.
So all the EU can do with them is to make it hurt while trying to avoid exactly the damage to the own economy that the US is causing. That way you try to leverage the reciprocal approach while trying to carry the economy for as long as possible.
That Trump is willing to escalate is apparent with China, but contrary to the EU, China has monopolies on goods and resources that it can (and already does) utilize to supplement tariffs. That will cause bigger damage than tariffs over time.
Of course the biggest absurdity is that a trade war like this harms the engine of every single country affected, destroying value AND lives just as much as a real war does but without the visibility.


And Apple is just calculating when the costs are justifying a required change. This is really not much of a blow to the walled garden strategy.


That is correct. But in this case, we can absolutely blame a specific part of humanity for this.


There have been historical reasons for the US to eye Greenland, mostly related to cold war defense strategies. It’s confusing that a Trump would want to realize these thoughts when it would be a offense to his handler in moscow. Suggests that these historical reasons are not his motivation.


WWIII and no time to deprogram the military infrastructure aka MaaS to not adjust savings time.


Your paranoia seems lamentable as I take it that you confuse me with your interlocutor. I was hoping that you would expand on your position in a less heated side-conversation. Apparently that hope was in vain. Good luck on your crusade to educate the renitent.


Can you explain to me - an uninvolved fellow fedditor - how helping working class people out of their debt traps is bad? I understand that this is just circling money around people who don’t need it as badly as the poorest of the poor globally speaking and that this is just combating the symptoms instead of the sickness but for the individuals supported that way, is there any specific catch associated that does make this support ring hollow?


Gotcha. Read up on that, if they would not have consented had they not been deceived seems to be the typical issue to rule on these cases.


would need to be further defined if informed consent can only happen if you know and can verify the personal details of your potential partner. I doubt that is the scope of it and courts would rule that you consent to the act, not necessarily to the identity of your partner beyond what is apparent to you. This is different to for example getting married to an individual intending to mislead you.


We are fighting literal fascists. Do you really think blaming the non-fascists will prevent these dishonest actors from doing their worst to ruin your life? It is by far the stupidest and most unhelpful position to blame the failings of the democratic position for the rise of the autocrats, when the latter are actively working to get into power.


In this timeline, madness is no dissuading argument.
The UK sure looks like a twink in this situation.