75% by media companies, divided into about 4 big owners,
25% by an independence pole made of their journalists, employees and readers.
The independence pole has the right to approve changes of shareholders.
The editors-in-chief of the different mediae of Le Monde Group are elected by the employees of the media.
The two last points provide an uncommon independence to Le Monde journalists compared to other big news sources.

I found some details here: https://www.straitstimes.com/world/europe/funds-linked-to-hungary-pm-orban-were-used-in-euronews-takeover-says-report
The paywalled Le Monde article cited as a source above: https://www.lemonde.fr/en/economy/article/2024/04/11/orban-s-shadow-looms-over-euronews-takeover_6668144_19.html

Lemmy’s insignificant caress.

MENA

Middle East and North Africa

It’s kind of the same situation in Japan. Check this documentary to learn about Japan’s Westein except he didn’t get cancelled at all and he still well respected by many. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predator:_The_Secret_Scandal_of_J-Pop

Why do you think it’s a generalization on boys rather than a denunciation of the negative impact of masculinists on boys?

The recent TV show Adolescence is a good watch related to this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolescence_(TV_series)

Yeah, EU will get a boost from it too.

China is clearly going to win this part, they are not adding tariffs on the rest of the world like Trump is doing, they will win market shares because of this. Trump’s policies are actually speeding up the rise of China as the first power on many points: international free trade, renewable energies and brain drain, for example.

Or with EU and Russian gas before they invaded Ukraine.

I work in data engineering, European cloud providers do not seem to be able to provide alternatives to managed data warehouses like Google Big Query or Snowflake.

That was the point for them, they were shitting on EU openly, stealing money from EU for the benefit of their party was how they showed their contempt for the institution. They even supported leaving the Euro zone, until they found out they couldn’t win the presidential election like this and became more nuanced on EU and refocused on immigration. Turns out French justice doesn’t forget.

Because what the US call conservative is what the EU calls far-right. EU conservatives, or traditional right, are similar to your average Democrat.

Pourquoi?

I think it works in some ways, there are tones of people who graduate university every year without having to pay for the diploma and getting money to live on top of that (bourse), based on household revenue. We still have a problem of reproduced inequalities, educated people marry each other and their kids are much more likely to graduate from top schools, but maybe it’s worse in the USA. I don’t hear the conservatives or (populist) far right criticizing this social system, they are more focused on immigration, so I guess the non-ethnicity based public help is good at avoiding this politization.

It may correlate with ethnicity, but the cases when it doesn’t are important too and it makes it a better condition. It’s also better at countering some far right arguments against help programs.

So the enemy of your ally is your ally and the allies of your enemy is you. Suddenly we notice we are all allies and we have some chill dinner together in a French restaurant in London before going home.

It does in general according to this government website. https://travail-emploi.gouv.fr/offre-demploi-et-embauche-les-droits-du-candidat#anchor-navigation-411

Machine translated:

The same applies to gender. No one can mention or have mentioned in a job offer the gender or family situation of the candidate sought. This prohibition applies to any form of advertising related to hiring, regardless of the nature of the proposed employment contract. The offer must therefore be written in such a way that it clearly indicates that it is addressed equally to men and women. For example, “Executive M/F” or “Employee.” For more details, one can refer to the document “Gender Equality in the Workplace.”

However, when belonging to one gender or the other meets an essential and determining professional requirement, and provided that the objective is legitimate and the requirement is proportionate, the above prohibition does not apply. Article R. 1142-1 of the Labor Code thus establishes the list of jobs and professional activities for which belonging to one gender or the other is a determining condition; this list, which is revised periodically, is as follows:

• Artists called to interpret either a female role or a male role;
• Models tasked with presenting clothing and accessories;
• Male and female models.

If you think it’s because there’s no help programs for minorities, there are, but it is usually based on the revenue of the household or the district.

The interesting part:

France has not traditionally been a place where DEI programmes have taken root because of legal limitations on the collection of racial and ethnic data. Employers are not allowed to factor people’s origins into hiring or promotion decisions.

In France, you cannot really base any official decision on the origin of someone, even just using the concept of race is considered racist and against the law. This is due to the trauma of Vichy’s regime Nazi collaboration but also the popularization of the idea that there is no scientific evidence for human races in the current human population by the famous anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss.