Trump is so good at making deals happen.

A few more quarters of this, and the Tesla hype value will surely die.

This and the GTA6 release date announcement today is a good news day.

Excellent news

You’re breaking my balls here Hans

I recognize that you consider them a group of people. But I am trying to understand your position. It sounds like you want the law to be blind to trans people/men/women, because any laws pertaining to a singular gender would be discriminatory.

Surely you can’t be speaking for all countries, though, when you say that it’s up to the judge? I would have thought that some countries would handle these things as a matter of law. In that case, wouldn’t it make sense to have a law for transgender people that’s different for men and women and trans people,?

In Australia, for example, it seems that trans women go to men’s prison; resulting in negative outcomes for the inmate. Perhaps a law in Australia would prevent that from happening?

Are you saying the law shouldn’t recognise trans people as a group? They should be just men or women (of their identification) in the eyes of the law?

Lets say a trans person breaks the law and goes to prison. Should a trans man go to a man’s prison (where they will face statistically higher rates of abuse), or should the law provide some nuance in this situation?

I’m not personally a lawyer. Also, I’m Australian and our discrimination laws don’t allow the laws to discriminate on the basis of protected qualities like sex, religion, age, sexual identity/orientation and intersex status.

Maybe some laws (I.e. protective laws) should apply more specifically to trans people though, I’m not sure what sort of awkward legal situations can arise by every law applying equally to every person.

How about the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013, which provides additional protections and services for women who are in domestic violence situations. Things like access to free rape exams, legal representation etc.

Yep, my point exactly. Admittedly I am not a trans person, but my understanding is that trans people have slightly different concerns, protections and risks than cis people.

Makes sense. I think it’s possible to hold this belief and still be pro-trans rights. There’s literally not a limit on the number of laws we can have, seems silly to change what a legal woman is rather than include transgender women people as an additional group that these laws can apply to.

I mean, it would be great if the global population was lower, whilst also not creating aging population issues. Automation plus UBI seems a lot better than “everyone kill grandma”. Big issue being that those that own the automation don’t want to pay forUBI.

Truely Trump is the master of the Art of the Deal

Fucking hell man.

I wonder at what point are the goods cost-prohibitive. I suppose it depends on the item. There’s many things that American made is still more than double the cost of the Chinese item.

Wait out Trump… I would bet that there will not be a fair election in 4 years’ time.

It’s horrible that I can immediately recognise Scomo by his ever-balding head.

I’d imagine that they’ll be more expensive to insure in the future if they are getting targeted en masse.

I wonder what the insurance premium on a Tesla is these days?

Haha maybe! Though I kind of expected no others due to how technologically disinterested people are down here TBH.

Oh yeah the annual firebreak check for sure does happen out my way, though definitely not every year. I think that’s spot on re/ personal vendettas. Oh yeah that stuff gets more hectic every year, even residential bush fire risk for new builds are really strict now depending on the BAL rating.