Let’s fight terrorism with terrorism. That’ll work.

Doesn’t say much on relative danger if you don’t include a ratio between the total imported/sales by country of origin vs total reports.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

It removes a sitting president without a gunshot?

Our vote of no confidence is impeachment. Same problem in regards to the party selecting the party leader in the UK. You actually have to have MPs/senators that actually agree.

He wasn’t detained either. He was charged by mail with a summons(postal requisition) and told to show up for his court date in May. In the US an investigative detention means stopping you in one place while in the UK detention generally only means bringing you to the police station and holding you for a charge. In the UK they call the former a stop. You’d have to necessarily be arrested for the later. He didn’t have either happen. I don’t even think he’s in the UK right now(which is likely why they did a postal requisition for a crime as serious as rape without issuing an arrest warrant and starting the extradition process). They want him to come in on his own.

Supposedly they did interview him at one point but that’s about it.

I thought he wasn’t even in the UK to be arrested. Did he go back?

Edit:

Brand has not been placed under arrest, the Met tells NPR. The agency says he was interviewed and then charged via “postal requisition” — a court summons informing him of the charges.

https://www.npr.org/2025/04/04/g-s1-58260/russell-brand-rape-assault

I guess the OP thinks he got arrested by mail since that’s not even the article title.

I think you could take an opossum. They generally forget they can bite while hissing. A puma on the other hand…

I understand the basis of the idea, I just don’t see any actual movement that justifies militarizing Greenland with US troops like he’s suggesting. The only ones seriously threatening to invade Greenland is the US. He’s giving Trump too much political cover by rationalizing his claims.

What is this security anxiety he’s referring to as justified based on? The only recent provocative acts I know about have been exclusively in the Baltic sea or nearby.

They’re not getting the first lady to actually do anything.

I think that micharacterizes his evilness and intent. He’s specifically saying that free trade was supposed to be a good thing because it would allow exploitation but it’s not allowing enough exploitation for his tastes. Essentially he’s arguing against liberal economic colonialism to support fascist economic colonialism. And he doesn’t want those countries to ever gain any advantage.

There is. Watch the video. That noise isn’t just the crowd screaming.

I figured my sarcasm was pretty obvious.

Well there’s always Alibaba, Huawei, and Tencent I guess.

And if we do, I will do all we can to enforce 100% OPSEC

Jesus Christ.

Common economic liberal take. Anything that endangers their “natural rights” to property is an evil action.

You can keep sticking to your guns about it being a legitimate government but you’re only hurting yourself with it.

business cannot survive without customers after all

That’s a really funny thing to say about a cemetery for the military dead.