There were shadowy conspiracists lurking in the dark alleys of Washington, and hiding from the glaring sun in the High Desert of California, but they were laughably easy prey when the Martian lizard people, the subterranean Vril-empowered mole-men, and the globalist pedophile Commies did show up.

  • 1 Post
  • 88 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 15th, 2024

help-circle



  • Explanation

    The first paragraph of Article 16a in the German constitution (Grundgesetz = GG) simply states:

    “The politically persecuted enjoy the right to asylum.”

    Paragraphs (2-5) were added later one by one, add a whole bunch of exceptions and restrictions, and look like this:

    Image

    Paragraph 2 states that you don’t have a right to asylum if you enter from an EU member country or one that has signed comparable agreements.
    That’s literally all countries bordering Germany!
    So by reaching the German border, you lose your right to asylum in Germany.















  • Fun fact: The last time we tried to ban a Nazi party, it failed because it had become “too irrelevant” and the ban “wasn’t necessary” anymore.
    The time before that, the ban failed because too many “moles” who had infiltrated the party and were on the payroll of this same intelligence agency, were actually Nazis and had taken on an active role in the party. So it was impossible to prove whether Nazi acts were directed by “real” party members or by agents of our intelligence agency.
    (There were lots of jokes back then about how the agency doesn’t need to ban the party, it would just vanish if they pulled back their agents.)

    This time around, the movement to ban this Nazi party faces resistance from conservatives who say the party is already too big and popular to ban, and should be countered in debate and through good governance. While on local/regional levels and behind the scenes, those same conservatives are already actively cooperating with them. Instead of good governance, they’ve decided to go for open corruption. And by “debate” they mean copying their talking points.